Generating sequences of images, or video, introduces significant complexity compared to synthesizing static images. While the core principles of GANs and diffusion models still apply, generating video demands explicit modeling of temporal dynamics to ensure coherence and realistic motion across frames. Simply generating frames independently often results in flickering artifacts or inconsistent object appearances, failing to capture the smooth transitions inherent in real-world video.
Extending generative models from images to video presents several distinct hurdles:
Several strategies have been developed to adapt GANs and diffusion models for video generation, moving beyond naive frame-by-frame synthesis:
3D Convolutional Networks: Just as 2D convolutions are effective for spatial patterns in images, 3D convolutions can simultaneously process spatial information within frames and temporal information across frames. Both the generator and discriminator in a Video GAN (VGAN) can employ 3D convolutional layers to learn spatio-temporal features directly from video data. The generator maps a latent vector z to a sequence of frames, while the discriminator takes a sequence of frames and outputs a probability of it being real.
G:z→{x1,x2,...,xT} D:{x1,x2,...,xT}→[0,1]Here, xt represents the frame at time t, and T is the total number of frames in the sequence.
Recurrent Architectures: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), particularly LSTMs or GRUs, can be integrated into the generator. For instance, an RNN can process a sequence of latent vectors, where each output state informs the generation of the corresponding frame, often in conjunction with convolutional layers. This explicitly models the sequential nature of video.
Factored Latent Spaces: Some architectures attempt to disentangle factors of variation, such as separating a latent representation for static content (e.g., object appearance, background) from a representation for dynamic motion. MoCoGAN (Motion and Content decomposed GAN) is an example where a content code is sampled once per sequence, while a sequence of motion codes drives the frame-to-frame changes.
A common structure for a Video GAN, potentially using separate latent codes for content and motion, processed by spatio-temporal generator and discriminator networks.
Diffusion models can also be extended to video. The core idea remains the same: gradually noise the data (forward process) and learn to reverse this process (denoising).
Forward Process: Gaussian noise is typically added independently to each frame at each diffusion timestep, potentially with shared noise schedules across frames.
q(x1:Tk∣x1:Tk−1)=t=1∏TN(xtk;1−βkxtk−1,βkI)where x1:Tk={x1k,...,xTk} is the sequence of frames at diffusion step k, and βk is the noise variance schedule.
Reverse Process: The denoising network must predict the noise added (or the less noisy video) across the entire sequence. This typically involves spatio-temporal network architectures, often U-Nets modified with 3D convolutions or incorporating temporal attention layers to process information across both space and time.
pθ(x1:Tk−1∣x1:Tk)=N(x1:Tk−1;μθ(x1:Tk,k),Σθ(x1:Tk,k))The network μθ (parameterized by θ) predicts the mean of the distribution for the previous step's video sequence given the current noisy sequence x1:Tk and the step k.
Conditioning video diffusion models (e.g., for text-to-video or action-conditional generation) follows similar principles as in image diffusion, often using classifier guidance or classifier-free guidance adapted to handle sequential inputs and outputs. Due to the high computational load, techniques like Latent Diffusion, where diffusion operates in a compressed latent space, are also being adapted for video.
Evaluating video quality requires assessing both per-frame realism and temporal characteristics. Metrics like Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) have been extended to video as Fréchet Video Distance (FVD). FVD uses features extracted from a pre-trained video classification network (like I3D) to compare the distribution of generated videos to real videos, considering both appearance and motion. Qualitative assessment remains important, scrutinizing videos for flickering, motion artifacts, and overall temporal smoothness.
Generating high-quality, temporally consistent video is an active area of research. While extending image generation techniques provides a foundation, addressing the unique challenges of temporal modeling often requires specialized architectures and training strategies, alongside considerable computational resources.
© 2025 ApX Machine Learning