Extensibility and Custom Dialects

The complexity and diversity of machine learning operations and target hardware architectures overwhelm the expressive capacity of traditional, monolithic Intermediate Representations. A core design philosophy enabling modern ML compilers, particularly MLIR, to manage this complexity is extensibility. Instead of attempting to define a single, universal set of operations and types, MLIR provides a framework for defining and composing modular dialects.

Dialects: Namespaces for ML Abstractions

Think of a dialect in MLIR as a dedicated namespace containing a specific set of operations, types, and attributes tailored to a particular domain or abstraction level. This modular approach allows MLIR to represent computations from very different layers simultaneously within the same infrastructure.

For instance, an ML model might initially be represented using operations from a high-level dialect mirroring TensorFlow (tf dialect) or PyTorch operators. Optimization passes might then progressively lower this representation into dialects focused on linear algebra (linalg dialect), structured control flow and loops (affine and scf dialects), vector operations (vector dialect), and eventually to hardware-specific dialects like llvm for CPUs, gpu for GPUs, or spirv for cross-vendor GPU programming.

Main components defined within a dialect include:

1. Operations (Ops): These are the fundamental units of computation or structure within the IR. Each operation belongs to a specific dialect (e.g., tf.Conv2D, linalg.matmul, affine.for, llvm.add). Operations define their arguments, results, attributes, and crucially, their semantics. They can also have custom assembly formats for textual representation and verifiers to ensure IR correctness according to the dialect's rules.
2. Types: Dialects can define custom data types in addition to the standard built-in types (like integers, floats, vectors, tensors). Examples include quantized types (!quant.uniform<i8:f32>) or types representing hardware-specific state or resources. These types ensure that operations operate on data with the intended semantics and constraints.
3. Attributes: Attributes provide compile-time metadata associated with operations or types. They are constant values used to configure operations (e.g., strides and padding for a convolution, represented as an ArrayAttr) or specify type characteristics (e.g., the memory space of a MemRef type). Dialects can define complex, structured attributes.

Progressive lowering of ML computations through different MLIR dialects, from high-level framework representations down to hardware-specific targets. Custom hardware dialects can be integrated into this flow.

Enabling Generality: Interfaces

While dialects provide specialization, building an effective compiler requires generic analyses and transformations that can operate across different dialects without knowing their specific details. MLIR achieves this through interfaces. An interface defines a contract or a set of methods that an operation or a dialect can implement.

For example, an InferTypeOpInterface allows operations from any dialect to provide logic for deriving their result types based on their operand types and attributes. A generic type inference pass can then query this interface on any operation, regardless of its dialect, to propagate type information through the IR. Similarly, interfaces exist for memory effects (MemoryEffectOpInterface), loop representation (LoopLikeOpInterface), and many other common compiler concepts, allowing passes like fusion, bufferization, or scheduling to be written more generically.

Defining Custom Dialects

The true power of MLIR's extensibility lies in the ability to define entirely new, custom dialects. This is essential for several reasons:

1. Supporting Novel Hardware: When targeting a new AI accelerator or DSP with unique instructions or memory architecture, a custom dialect can directly represent its capabilities. Lowering passes can then translate mid-level abstractions (like linalg ops) into the specific operations of this custom hardware dialect.
2. Domain-Specific Optimizations: For certain domains (e.g., sparse computations, specific signal processing tasks), a custom dialect can provide higher-level operations that capture domain semantics more effectively, enabling more powerful specialized optimizations before lowering to more general forms.
3. Research and Experimentation: Researchers can rapidly prototype new IR constructs or optimization strategies by defining custom dialects without needing to modify the core MLIR framework or interfere with existing dialects.

Defining a dialect typically involves using MLIR's C++ API or, more commonly, TableGen. TableGen is a declarative description language used extensively within LLVM and MLIR to define records representing IR components like operations, types, attributes, and interfaces. From these TableGen descriptions, C++ code implementing the dialect's classes, parsers, printers, and verification logic is automatically generated, significantly reducing boilerplate code.

For instance, defining a custom operation involves specifying its name (within the dialect namespace), its arguments and results (with type constraints), its attributes, and potentially C++ methods for verification, shape inference, or defining specific properties via interfaces.

Advantages of Extensibility

MLIR's dialect system provides significant advantages for building sophisticated ML compilers:

• Modularity: Dialects encapsulate domain-specific logic, making the compiler easier to understand, maintain, and extend.
• Separation of Concerns: High-level, hardware-agnostic optimizations can be cleanly separated from low-level, target-specific code generation.
• Reusability: Generic infrastructure (parsing, verification, pass management) and interfaces allow common analyses and transformations to be reused across different dialects.
• Progressive Lowering: The ability to mix dialects allows for gradual transformation from abstract, framework-level representations down to concrete hardware instructions, with optimizations applied at the most appropriate level of abstraction.
• Adaptability: The system readily adapts to new ML models, algorithms, and hardware targets by adding new dialects without disrupting existing ones.

By using extensibility through dialects and interfaces, MLIR provides a foundation for tackling the challenges of optimizing diverse ML workloads across an evolving hardware environment. Understanding this core principle is essential for appreciating the design of modern ML compilation stacks and how they achieve high performance.