When evaluating synthetic data, we often talk about two main goals: achieving high fidelity and ensuring high utility. While these terms might sound similar, they represent distinct aspects of data quality, and understanding the difference is significant for assessing whether your generated data is truly useful.
Fidelity refers to how closely the statistical properties of the synthetic dataset match those of the original, real dataset. Think of it as the likeness or resemblance. High-fidelity synthetic data mirrors the real data in terms of:
Essentially, fidelity focuses on recreating the patterns and structure observed in the source data. We use the statistical comparisons and visual inspection methods covered previously to measure fidelity. The closer the synthetic data's characteristics are to the real data's characteristics, the higher its fidelity.
Utility, on the other hand, refers to how effective the synthetic data is for a specific downstream task, usually training a machine learning model. It measures the usefulness of the data for its intended purpose. High utility means that a model trained only on the synthetic data performs well when evaluated on real data.
Measuring utility typically involves a practical test:
If the model performs well on the real test set (e.g., achieves high accuracy, low error, or other relevant performance metrics), the synthetic data is considered to have high utility for that specific task. Utility is task-dependent; data with high utility for a classification task might not have high utility for a regression task, even if derived from the same real dataset.
You might assume that high fidelity automatically leads to high utility. Often, there's a strong positive correlation. If synthetic data accurately captures the underlying patterns of the real data (high fidelity), a model trained on it is likely to generalize well to real data (high utility).
However, this isn't always the case:
The choice between prioritizing fidelity or utility often depends on the project's goals:
This diagram illustrates the two primary goals in evaluating synthetic data. Fidelity focuses on similarity to real data properties, while Utility focuses on performance for a specific machine learning task. Evaluation metrics assess both aspects, which are often related but distinct.
In practice, a good evaluation strategy considers both. You often start by aiming for reasonable fidelity using statistical checks and visualizations. Then, you confirm its value by measuring its utility for your target machine learning application. Understanding this distinction helps you choose the right evaluation methods and interpret the results effectively, ensuring your synthetic data truly serves its purpose.
© 2025 ApX Machine Learning