N-gram models are a conventional approach for understanding language probabilities. Despite their foundational role, these models encounter a significant limitation: they struggle with word sequences not encountered during training. For example, if the trigram "wreck a nice" never appeared in text data, an N-gram model would assign a zero probability to the word "beach" following it. This problem, known as data sparsity, means N-gram models have limited capabilities for generalization.
This is where neural networks provide a more powerful and flexible approach to language modeling. Instead of simply counting word co-occurrences, a neural network learns to represent words based on their context and meaning.
The first step in a neural language model is to move away from treating words as simple, distinct text labels. Instead, each word is mapped to a dense list of numbers called a word embedding or a word vector.
The important property of these vectors is that words with similar meanings or that are used in similar contexts will have similar vectors. For example, the vectors for "nice", "good", and "lovely" would be mathematically close to each other in the vector space. This single change allows the model to generalize far better than an N-gram model. If the model has learned the phrase "a good day", it can infer that "a nice day" is also a likely phrase because the vectors for "good" and "nice" are similar.
A comparison of the N-gram and neural network approaches. The N-gram model relies on direct lookups, while the neural network processes numerical representations of words to understand context.
Another limitation of N-gram models is their fixed, short-term memory. A trigram model, for instance, only ever considers the two preceding words. It has no information about words that appeared earlier in the sentence.
Neural network architectures designed for sequences, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), address this. An RNN processes a sentence one word at a time and maintains an internal state, or "memory," that is updated with each new word. This state allows the model to retain information from the beginning of a sentence and use it to make better predictions later on. For example, in the sentence "My friends from Germany, who I haven't seen in years, are finally coming to visit. I can't wait to speak... ", an RNN is much more likely to predict the word "German" than an N-gram model because it can remember the context of "Germany" from much earlier.
In summary, neural network language models offer two main advantages over traditional N-gram models:
Because of this superior performance, neural network-based language models are now the standard in virtually all modern speech recognition systems. While the details of models like LSTMs (Long Short-Term Memory networks) and Transformers are topics for a more advanced course, your understanding of N-grams provides the perfect background for appreciating why these more complex models are so effective.
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with