Classical kernel methods, like Support Vector Machines (SVMs), implicitly map input data into a higher-dimensional feature space via a mapping . The kernel function then efficiently calculates the inner product in this space, without needing to explicitly compute the coordinates of . The geometry of this classical feature space is directly determined by the choice of the kernel function. For instance:
Quantum kernels operate on a similar principle but utilize a quantum feature map to embed data into a quantum feature space, the Hilbert space of a multi-qubit system. The quantum kernel is typically computed from the inner product of these quantum states, often as . This difference in the underlying space and the method of calculating similarity leads to significant geometric distinctions compared to classical kernels.
The most immediate difference lies in the potential dimensionality. For an -qubit system, the Hilbert space has dimension . This exponential scaling offers a potentially immense space for representing data.
Comparison of classical and quantum kernel mappings. Quantum feature maps embed data into an exponentially large Hilbert space, calculating kernels via quantum state overlap.
While classical kernels like RBF also map to infinite dimensions, the structure imposed by quantum mechanics is fundamentally different. The geometry of is not just "large"; it's structured by the principles of superposition and entanglement generated by the quantum feature map circuit .
The specific geometry depends entirely on the choice of the quantum circuit used for encoding. A simple product state encoding might create a relatively simple geometry, whereas a circuit with significant entangling capabilities can create intricate structures within the Hilbert space.
Classical kernels directly compute the inner product . This value relates directly to the angle between the feature vectors in and often serves as a direct measure of similarity.
Quantum kernels typically use the squared magnitude of the inner product, . This quantity is related to the probability of transitioning from state to (or measuring one state in the basis defined by the other). This squaring introduces an additional non-linearity compared to the direct inner product. Geometrically, it means the quantum kernel is sensitive not just to the angle between state vectors in Hilbert space but to the overlap probability. Two pairs of states could have the same angle between them but different kernel values if their global phase differs, although this phase is often irrelevant when using the squared overlap. More importantly, the mapping itself is highly non-linear due to the nature of quantum gates.
The hope is that the unique geometry of the quantum feature space allows for better separation of complex datasets. By mapping data into this high-dimensional, structured space, linear separation (as performed by SVM) in might correspond to highly non-linear separation in the original input space.
The geometric differences imply that quantum kernels might excel at tasks where the underlying data structure aligns well with the geometry induced by quantum evolution (superposition and entanglement), potentially capturing correlations missed by classical kernels. Conversely, classical kernels might be more effective or efficient for problems whose structure naturally fits polynomial or Gaussian relationships. Understanding and designing feature maps that induce problem-specific, advantageous geometries is a primary focus in quantum kernel research.
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with