The update gate within a GRU cell, denoted as , plays a significant role in managing the flow of information and determining the composition of the next hidden state, . Its primary function is to decide how much of the information from the previous hidden state, , should be retained and carried forward, versus how much influence the newly computed candidate state, , should have.
The update gate computes its activation value, , based on the current input vector and the previous hidden state . The calculation involves learned weight matrices ( for the input, for the previous hidden state) and a bias vector (). These are passed through a sigmoid activation function () to produce values between 0 and 1.
The formula for the update gate activation at time step is:
Let's break down the components:
The output, , is a vector of the same dimension as the hidden state. Each element in corresponds to a dimension in the hidden state vector.
The values in the vector act as gates or filters. Because of the sigmoid function, each element is between 0 and 1:
This gating mechanism is element-wise, meaning the GRU can decide to retain some features from the past while updating others based on the current input.
The update gate directly participates in the calculation of the final hidden state . The GRU computes by performing an interpolation between the previous hidden state and the candidate hidden state . The update gate controls this interpolation.
The formula for the final hidden state is:
Here:
This equation shows how balances the influence:
Essentially, dynamically determines, for each dimension of the hidden state, whether to copy the value from the previous time step or to update it with the newly computed candidate value.
Calculation flow for the update gate () and its role in combining the previous hidden state () and the candidate state () to produce the new hidden state ().
The ability of the update gate to allow information from to pass through largely unchanged (when ) is fundamental to the GRU's success in capturing longer-range dependencies compared to simple RNNs. If the network learns that certain information is relevant over many steps, it can set the corresponding elements of close to 1 for those steps, effectively creating a shortcut for that information through time.
This mechanism also helps alleviate the vanishing gradient problem. During backpropagation, the gradient can flow back through the term. If is close to 1, the gradient associated with can pass backward relatively unimpeded, preventing it from diminishing too quickly across many time steps.
In summary, the update gate provides a flexible and adaptive mechanism within the GRU cell. It learns to control how much of the past context stored in should be preserved and how much new information from the candidate state should be integrated, enabling the network to effectively model sequential data with varying dependency lengths.
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with