RLHF: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Chapter 1: Foundations of RLHF for Language Model Alignment
The AI Alignment Problem in LLMs
Limitations of Supervised Fine-Tuning
Reinforcement Learning Principles Refresher
Introduction to the RLHF Process
Setting Up the Development Environment
Chapter 2: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) Phase
Role of SFT in the RLHF Pipeline
Curating High-Quality SFT Datasets
SFT Implementation Details
Evaluating SFT Model Performance
Hands-on Practical: SFT Execution
Chapter 3: Reward Modeling from Human Preferences
Concept of Learning from Preferences
Human Preference Data Collection
Preference Dataset Formats and Structures
Reward Model Architectures
Training Objectives for Reward Models
Calibration of Reward Models
Potential Issues in Reward Modeling
Hands-on Practical: Training a Reward Model
Chapter 4: RL Fine-Tuning with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
PPO Algorithm for RLHF Context
Policy and Value Network Implementation
The Role of the KL Divergence Penalty
Calculating Advantages and Returns
PPO Hyperparameter Tuning for LLMs
Common PPO Implementation Libraries (TRL)
Troubleshooting PPO Training Instability
Practice: Implementing the PPO Update Step
Chapter 5: Integrating the Full RLHF Pipeline
Workflow Orchestration
Model Loading and Initialization
Generating Responses with the Policy Model
Scoring Responses with the Reward Model
Synchronizing Models During Training
Code Structure for an End-to-End RLHF System
Hands-on Practical: Running a Simplified RLHF Loop
Chapter 6: Advanced RLHF Techniques and Alternatives
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
Improving Sample Efficiency in RLHF
Addressing Reward Hacking Explicitly
Multi-Objective Reward Models
Contextual and Conditional RLHF
Practice: Comparing PPO and DPO Concepts
Chapter 7: Evaluation, Analysis, and Deployment
Metrics for Evaluating Aligned Models
Human Evaluation Protocols
Automated Evaluation Suites
Analyzing Policy Shift During RL Tuning
Red Teaming and Safety Testing
Computational Costs and Scalability
Deployment Considerations for RLHF Models
Hands-on Practical: Analyzing RLHF Run Logs
Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
Was this section helpful?
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback, Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, Carol Chen, Catherine Olsson, Christopher Olah, Danny Hernandez, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Dustin Li, Eli Tran-Johnson, Ethan Perez, Jamie Kerr, Jared Mueller, Jeffrey Ladish, Joshua Landau, Kamal Ndousse, Kamile Lukosuite, Liane Lovitt, Michael Sellitto, Nelson Elhage, Nicholas Schiefer, Noemi Mercado, Nova DasSarma, Robert Lasenby, Robin Larson, Sam Ringer, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Sheer El Showk, Stanislav Fort, Tamera Lanham, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Tom Conerly, Tom Henighan, Tristan Hume, Samuel R. Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, Jared Kaplan, 2022 arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.08073 - This seminal paper introduces Constitutional AI, a key RLAIF method that uses a set of principles to guide an AI critic in generating feedback for model alignment, reducing reliance on extensive human labeling.
- Self-Rewarding Language Models, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, Jason Weston, 2024 ICML 2024 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.10020 - This paper introduces the concept of language models generating their own reward feedback for further training, showcasing an evolution of AI feedback mechanisms where the model directly refines itself.
© 2025 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with