Selecting the most powerful GPU instance available might feel like the safest bet, but it's often the quickest way to burn through your budget. Right-sizing is the disciplined process of matching infrastructure resources, such as CPU, GPU, and memory, to the specific demands of your AI workload. The goal is to provision enough capacity to meet performance targets without paying for idle resources. This practice moves you from a "just-in-case" provisioning model to a "just-enough" model, which is essential for cost control.
The challenge is avoiding two common failure modes: underprovisioning and overprovisioning. Underprovisioning, or not allocating enough resources, leads to poor performance. Training jobs may run too slowly, lengthening development cycles, or inference endpoints might fail to meet latency requirements, resulting in a poor user experience. Overprovisioning, the more frequent issue in cost management, means you are paying for capacity that your application never uses. An expensive GPU that is consistently utilized at only 10% is pure financial waste.
Effective right-sizing is not based on guesswork; it is based on measurement. Before you can choose the correct instance, you must first understand your workload's resource profile. This involves using the monitoring and profiling tools we covered in Chapter 5 to collect data on a representative workload.
Start by running your training script or inference service on a baseline instance and collect these primary metrics:
Once you have this data, you can begin to make informed decisions. For example, if your profiling shows low GPU utilization but maxed-out CPU cores, the immediate solution is not a bigger GPU. The correct action is to optimize your data loading pipeline or select an instance with a higher CPU-to-GPU ratio. Conversely, if your workload fails due to "out of memory" errors on the GPU, you have a clear signal to select an instance with more VRAM.
Training jobs are typically long-running, batch-processing tasks where the primary goal is to complete the training in an acceptable amount of time for a minimal total cost. The cost is not just the hourly rate of the instance but the total cost for the entire job.
A faster, more expensive GPU might complete the job so quickly that its total cost is lower than that of a cheaper, slower GPU that runs for many more hours. To find the sweet spot, you should run a small-scale experiment, training for a few epochs on several different instance types and extrapolating the total time and cost.
The total job cost for three different GPU instances. While the A100 instance has the highest hourly rate, it completes the job fastest, resulting in the lowest overall cost.
Inference workloads have different characteristics. They are often expected to run continuously, serve user requests with low latency, and handle variable traffic loads. Here, the primary metric is performance-per-dollar, often measured as inferences-per-second-per-dollar.
For inference, a large GPU is frequently overkill. Techniques like quantization and model compilation can make models small and efficient enough to run on CPUs or specialized inference accelerators, which offer much lower costs. The right-sizing process for inference involves:
An auto-scaling group for an inference service. A load balancer distributes traffic, while a monitoring service adjusts the number of active instances based on demand.
Right-sizing is not a one-time setup. It is a continuous cycle. Your models will change, your code will be updated, and your user traffic patterns will shift. A decision that was optimal three months ago might be inefficient today. You should build periodic re-profiling and re-evaluation into your MLOps lifecycle to ensure your infrastructure remains aligned with your workload's actual needs, keeping performance high and costs low.
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningAI Ethics & Transparency•