Any single machine learning model, no matter how well-tuned, has its limitations. A decision tree might overfit to the training data, capturing noise instead of the underlying signal. A linear model might be too simple, failing to capture complex patterns. The core idea behind ensemble methods is that we can achieve better performance by combining the predictions of several individual models rather than relying on just one.
This approach is often compared to the "wisdom of the crowd." If you ask one person for an estimate, their answer might be far from the truth. But if you ask a large, diverse group and average their answers, the result is often accurate. In machine learning, an ensemble method is a technique that creates and combines multiple models, called base learners, to produce a single, unified prediction. The resulting ensemble model is frequently more accurate than any of its individual components.
A general structure of an ensemble method, where predictions from multiple base models are combined to form a final, more reliable prediction.
The models that make up the ensemble are called base learners or base estimators. While you could technically use any type of model, a common practice, and one we will focus on, is to use decision trees. These base learners are often constrained to be simple or "weak," for example, by limiting their depth. A collection of these weak learners can then be combined into a powerful ensemble.
The effectiveness of ensemble methods comes from their ability to improve a model's generalization capabilities. They achieve this primarily by reducing prediction errors, which can be broken down into three main advantages.
By combining the "votes" or predictions of multiple models, the ensemble can smooth out the incorrect predictions made by any single model. For a classification task, this might involve a majority vote: if three out of five models predict "Class A" and two predict "Class B," the ensemble's final prediction is "Class A." For regression, the predictions are typically averaged. This aggregation process helps to cancel out random errors, leading to a more accurate final result.
Ensemble models are less sensitive to the specific characteristics of the training data. A single decision tree can change dramatically if you slightly alter the training set. An ensemble, however, tends to be more stable. Since it relies on the consensus of many different models, small changes in the data are less likely to alter the final prediction significantly. This makes the model more reliable when deployed on new, unseen data.
The power of ensembles lies in their ability to manage the bias-variance tradeoff effectively. Different ensemble strategies address this tradeoff in different ways:
As we will see, bagging is a prime example of a variance-reducing technique, while boosting excels at reducing bias. Understanding this distinction is fundamental to choosing and building the right kind of ensemble for your specific problem. With this foundation, we can now explore the two primary strategies for constructing these ensembles: bagging and boosting.
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with