Statistical Tests for Stationarity (ADF Test)

Assessing stationarity through visual inspection can be subjective, as subtle trends or slow mean reversion are often difficult to identify. A more objective and quantitative method is required to formally test whether a time series meets the conditions for stationarity. Statistical hypothesis tests provide this formal approach, allowing for a precise evaluation of stationarity.

One of the most widely used tests for stationarity is the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test.

The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test

The ADF test is a type of statistical test called a unit root test. The presence of a "unit root" is a formal way of saying that the time series is non-stationary. Specifically, it indicates that shocks or past values have a persistent effect on the future values of the series, which is characteristic of non-stationary processes like random walks.

The core idea is to set up a hypothesis test:

• Null Hypothesis ($H_0$): The time series has a unit root (it is non-stationary).
• Alternative Hypothesis ($H_a$): The time series does not have a unit root (it is stationary).

Our goal is typically to find evidence against the null hypothesis. If we can reject $H_0$, we gain confidence that our series is stationary (or has been successfully transformed to be stationary).

Interpreting the ADF Test Results

The ADF test produces several outputs, but the most significant ones for our interpretation are the ADF Test Statistic and the p-value.

1. ADF Test Statistic: This is a negative number. The more negative this statistic is, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis (i.e., stronger evidence for stationarity).
2. p-value: This value represents the probability of observing the given test statistic (or a more extreme one) if the null hypothesis were true.
   • If the p-value is small (typically $\le 0.05$): We reject the null hypothesis ($H_0$). This means there's strong evidence that the series is stationary.
   • If the p-value is large (typically $> 0.05$): We fail to reject the null hypothesis ($H_0$). This means there isn't enough evidence to conclude the series is stationary; we assume it is non-stationary.
3. Critical Values: The test also provides critical values for the test statistic at different significance levels (e.g., 1%, 5%, 10%). If the ADF Test Statistic is less (i.e., more negative) than the critical value at a certain significance level (e.g., 5%), we can reject the null hypothesis at that level. Comparing the test statistic to these critical values provides another way to evaluate the hypothesis.

Implementing the ADF Test in Python

The statsmodels library provides a convenient implementation of the ADF test. Let's see how to use it. Assuming you have a Pandas Series series_data containing your time series values:

# Import the adfuller function
from statsmodels.tsa.stattools import adfuller
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Example: Generate non-stationary data (random walk)
np.random.seed(42)
random_walk = np.random.randn(500).cumsum()
series_data_non_stationary = pd.Series(random_walk)

# Example: Generate stationary data (white noise)
white_noise = np.random.randn(500)
series_data_stationary = pd.Series(white_noise)

# Define a function to perform and print ADF test results
def perform_adf_test(series, series_name=""):
    print(f"--- ADF Test Results for {series_name} ---")
    # Perform the ADF test
    result = adfuller(series.dropna()) # dropna() handles potential NaNs from differencing

    # Extract and print results
    print(f'ADF Statistic: {result[0]:.4f}')
    print(f'p-value: {result[1]:.4f}')
    print('Critical Values:')
    for key, value in result[4].items():
        print(f'\t{key}: {value:.4f}')

    # Interpret the p-value
    if result[1] <= 0.05:
        print("\nConclusion: Reject the null hypothesis (H0). Data is likely stationary.")
    else:
        print("\nConclusion: Fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0). Data is likely non-stationary.")
    print("-"*(30 + len(series_name))) # Separator

# Test the non-stationary data
perform_adf_test(series_data_non_stationary, "Random Walk (Non-Stationary Example)")

print("\n") # Add space between outputs

# Test the stationary data
perform_adf_test(series_data_stationary, "White Noise (Stationary Example)")

Output of the code:

--- ADF Test Results for Random Walk (Non-Stationary Example) ---
ADF Statistic: -1.1272
p-value: 0.6964
Critical Values:
	1%: -3.4436
	5%: -2.8674
	10%: -2.5699

Conclusion: Fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0). Data is likely non-stationary.
-------------------------------------------------------------

--- ADF Test Results for White Noise (Stationary Example) ---
ADF Statistic: -22.0378
p-value: 0.0000
Critical Values:
	1%: -3.4436
	5%: -2.8674
	10%: -2.5699

Conclusion: Reject the null hypothesis (H0). Data is likely stationary.
--------------------------------------------------------

Interpretation:

• For the Random Walk data, the p-value (0.6964) is much greater than 0.05. Also, the ADF Statistic (-1.1272) is greater (less negative) than all the critical values. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that this series is likely non-stationary, as expected.
• For the White Noise data, the p-value is extremely small (reported as 0.0000), which is less than 0.05. The ADF Statistic (-22.0378) is much more negative than all the critical values. We strongly reject the null hypothesis and conclude that this series is likely stationary.

The ADF test is a standard tool in the time series analysis toolkit. It provides a formal way to check the stationarity assumption before proceeding to models like ARIMA, which rely on it. If the test indicates non-stationarity, we'll need to apply transformations, such as differencing, which we cover next.