Text chunks are transformed into numerical representations known as embeddings. These vectors capture the semantic meaning of their corresponding text snippets, placing similar concepts closer together in a high-dimensional space.
But now you face a new challenge: how do you efficiently search through potentially hundreds of thousands, millions, or even billions of these vectors? Imagine receiving a user query, embedding it, and then needing to find the document chunks with the most similar embeddings. Performing a brute-force comparison against every single vector in your dataset becomes computationally impractical very quickly. This is precisely the problem that vector stores are designed to solve.
A vector store, often referred to as a vector database, is a specialized type of database optimized for storing, managing, and querying large collections of high-dimensional vectors, such as the text embeddings generated in the previous steps of our RAG pipeline. Unlike traditional relational or document databases that excel at structured data lookups or keyword searches, vector stores are built for similarity search. Their primary goal is to find vectors in the database that are "closest" or most similar to a given query vector, enabling semantic retrieval rather than just lexical matching.
Vector stores perform several essential functions within a RAG system:
Storage: They provide a persistent or in-memory location to store the embedding vectors. Critically, they also allow you to store associated metadata alongside each vector. This metadata might include the original text chunk the vector represents, the source document's ID or filename, page numbers, URLs, or any other contextual information needed for your application. Without this link back to the original data, the retrieved vectors alone wouldn't be very useful.
Indexing (Approximate Nearest Neighbors - ANN): This is where the magic happens for efficient searching. Finding the exact nearest neighbors to a query vector in a high-dimensional space (Exact Nearest Neighbor search) is computationally expensive, often scaling linearly or worse with the dataset size. Vector stores overcome this by using Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) algorithms. ANN algorithms build sophisticated index structures (like HNSW, IVF, LSH, or others depending on the specific vector store) that allow for dramatically faster searching. They trade a small, often negligible, amount of accuracy (meaning they might occasionally miss the absolute closest vector but will find extremely close ones) for massive gains in speed, making searches feasible even on enormous datasets.
Querying: Once the vectors are indexed, the vector store provides an interface to perform similarity searches. Typically, you provide the query vector (the embedding of the user's input) and specify the number of nearest neighbors () you want to retrieve. The store uses its ANN index to rapidly identify the top- vectors from the dataset that are most similar to the query vector based on a chosen similarity metric.
How is "similarity" or "closeness" measured between vectors? Vector stores typically support several distance metrics:
The choice of metric often depends on the properties of the embeddings being used (e.g., whether they are normalized) and the specific task. Cosine similarity is frequently the default for text-based RAG.
The ecosystem of vector stores has grown rapidly. Here are a few examples, illustrating the variety available:
The choice depends on factors like scale, performance requirements, ease of use, deployment model (self-hosted vs. managed service), and specific features needed for your application.
This diagram illustrates the flow: source documents are split and embedded, the embeddings and associated metadata are stored and indexed in the vector store. At query time, the user query is embedded, and the vector store performs a similarity search using its index to find the most relevant vectors, finally retrieving the associated metadata (the original text chunks) to be used as context.
Here's a simplified Python example showing the basic interaction pattern using a Chroma client:
# Example using a Chroma-like client
import chromadb
# Assume an embedding function is available or embeddings are pre-computed
# from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# embedding_model = SentenceTransformer('all-MiniLM-L6-v2')
# Initialize client (e.g., connects to a local Chroma instance)
client = chromadb.Client()
# Create or get a collection (acts like a dedicated table for vectors)
# Specify the distance function if desired (default is often l2)
collection = client.get_or_create_collection(
name="my_documents_collection",
metadata={"hnsw:space": "cosine"} # Example: specify cosine distance for HNSW index
)
# --- Indexing Phase ---
# Assume 'doc_chunks' is a list of strings (your document snippets)
# Assume 'doc_embeddings' is a list of lists/arrays (corresponding embeddings)
# Assume 'doc_ids' is a list of unique strings for each chunk
# Assume 'doc_metadata' is a list of dictionaries [{'source': 'doc1.pdf', 'chunk_id': 0}, ...]
# Add vectors, metadata, and potentially original documents to the collection
# Note: Computing embeddings might happen here or beforehand
collection.add(
# embeddings=doc_embeddings, # Provide pre-computed embeddings OR
documents=doc_chunks, # Let Chroma compute embeddings if configured
metadatas=doc_metadata,
ids=doc_ids # Unique IDs are required
)
# --- Query Phase ---
query_text = "What is the role of vector stores in RAG?"
# Assume query_embedding is computed using the same model used for doc_embeddings
# query_embedding = embedding_model.encode([query_text]).tolist()[0]
# Query the collection to find the top 5 most similar document chunks
results = collection.query(
query_texts=[query_text], # Provide query text OR
# query_embeddings=[query_embedding], # Provide pre-computed query embedding
n_results=5, # Request the top 5 results
# include=['metadatas', 'documents', 'distances'] # Specify what to return
)
# Process the results
retrieved_docs = results.get('documents', [[]])[0]
retrieved_metadatas = results.get('metadatas', [[]])[0]
retrieved_distances = results.get('distances', [[]])[0]
print("Query:", query_text)
for i, doc in enumerate(retrieved_docs):
print(f"\nResult {i+1}: (Distance: {retrieved_distances[i]:.4f})")
print(f" Metadata: {retrieved_metadatas[i]}")
print(f" Document Chunk: {doc[:200]}...") # Print snippet
# The 'retrieved_docs' or chunks identified by 'retrieved_metadatas'
# are then passed to the LLM as context.
In summary, vector stores are a fundamental component of the RAG architecture. They provide the necessary infrastructure to efficiently index and search through immense quantities of semantic information represented as vectors, enabling the retrieval of relevant context needed to augment the capabilities of Large Language Models. They bridge the gap between your external data and the LLM's generation process.
Cleaner syntax. Built-in debugging. Production-ready from day one.
Built for the AI systems behind ApX Machine Learning
Was this section helpful?
© 2026 ApX Machine LearningEngineered with