While techniques like generating interaction terms (f1×f2) or polynomial features (f12) provide systematic ways to explore relationships in your data, they often operate without understanding the meaning behind the variables. The most insightful and performant features frequently arise not from automated transformations alone, but from a deeper understanding of the problem domain itself. This is where domain-specific feature engineering comes into play.
Think of it as leveraging expert knowledge about the real-world process that generated the data. If you're predicting house prices, knowing that total_square_footage
is often more informative than just living_room_sqft
and bedroom_sqft
separately is domain knowledge. If you're analyzing sensor data from an industrial machine, knowing that a sudden temperature_increase
combined with a simultaneous vibration_spike
often precedes a failure is domain knowledge. Algorithms might eventually discover these relationships, especially with enough data, but explicitly engineering features based on this understanding can significantly accelerate learning and improve model accuracy.
Domain-specific features are derived from understanding the nuances, rules, and relationships inherent to the field your data comes from. Why is this so effective?
average_purchase_value
or body_mass_index
) are often easier for stakeholders to understand and trust compared to models relying solely on abstract interaction terms or principal components.distance_to_city_center
.Let's consider how domain knowledge translates into concrete features:
user_id
, purchase_timestamp
, item_price
, category
.days_since_last_purchase
, average_inter_purchase_time
, customer_lifetime_value
(CLV, potentially calculated via a separate model or formula), most_frequent_category
, basket_size
(items per transaction), session_duration
.account_id
, transaction_amount
, timestamp
, merchant_code
, customer_income
, customer_debt
.transaction_frequency_last_7_days
, average_transaction_value
, is_international
, time_of_day_category
(e.g., 'late_night'), debt_to_income_ratio
, credit_utilization_ratio
.patient_id
, heart_rate
, blood_pressure_systolic
, blood_pressure_diastolic
, temperature
, weight_kg
, height_m
.body_mass_index
(BMI=heightm2weightkg), pulse_pressure
(Systolic−Diastolic), mean_arterial_pressure
(MAP≈Diastolic+31PulsePressure), risk scores derived from combinations of vitals (like components of SOFA or MEWS scores).sensor_id
, timestamp
, temperature
, pressure
, vibration_x
, vibration_y
.rate_of_temperature_change
, total_vibration_magnitude
(vibrationx2+vibrationy2), pressure_rolling_stddev_1min
, operating_state
(derived from sensor patterns).This diagram illustrates how raw data points can be combined using domain knowledge to create more informative features:
Deriving features like Body Mass Index (BMI), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), and Inter-Purchase Time from raw measurements using domain-specific formulas.
How do you gain and apply this knowledge?
Implementing domain-specific features typically involves data manipulation, often using libraries like Pandas. For example, calculating BMI is straightforward:
# Assuming 'df' is your Pandas DataFrame
df['bmi'] = df['weight_kg'] / (df['height_m'] ** 2)
Calculating time differences requires datetime manipulation:
import pandas as pd
# Ensure timestamps are datetime objects
# Example DataFrame setup (replace with your actual data loading)
data = {'user_id': [1, 1, 2, 1, 2],
'purchase_timestamp': ['2023-01-10 10:00:00', '2023-01-15 12:30:00', '2023-01-12 08:00:00', '2023-01-05 09:00:00', '2023-01-20 15:00:00']}
df = pd.DataFrame(data)
df['purchase_timestamp'] = pd.to_datetime(df['purchase_timestamp'])
# Sort by user and time to calculate time since last purchase
df = df.sort_values(by=['user_id', 'purchase_timestamp'])
# Calculate the difference in time between consecutive purchases for the same user
df['time_since_last_purchase'] = df.groupby('user_id')['purchase_timestamp'].diff()
# Convert timedelta to a numerical unit, e.g., days
# .dt.days extracts the number of full days from the timedelta
df['days_since_last_purchase'] = df['time_since_last_purchase'].dt.days
# Display the result (optional)
# print(df)
# user_id purchase_timestamp time_since_last_purchase days_since_last_purchase
# 3 1 2023-01-05 09:00:00 NaT NaN
# 0 1 2023-01-10 10:00:00 5 days 01:00:00 5.0
# 1 1 2023-01-15 12:30:00 5 days 02:30:00 5.0
# 2 2 2023-01-12 08:00:00 NaT NaN
# 4 2 2023-01-20 15:00:00 8 days 07:00:00 8.0
While the implementation might use standard tools like Pandas, the logic defining the feature comes directly from your understanding of the domain. These newly created features can then be subjected to the scaling, encoding, or selection techniques discussed in other chapters.
Ultimately, combining automated feature creation techniques with thoughtful, domain-driven feature engineering often leads to the most effective and accurate machine learning models. It requires critical thinking and sometimes creativity, moving beyond purely mechanical data transformation into the art of understanding the data's real-world context.
© 2025 ApX Machine Learning